Skip to content

Video companion

After Root Causes + Dustin Moody: on-ramp signatures and backup algorithms

Root Causes episode 613 features Dustin Moody on the state of NIST PQC contests — including backup KEMs, on-ramp digital signatures, and evaluation criteria beyond security proofs.

NIST PQC on-ramp signature competition overview.
How to Build Your 12-Month Post-Quantum Strategy With NIST's Dustin Moody Watch on YouTube

What the episode covers

Moody explains why NIST continues evaluating algorithms after releasing FIPS 204 (ML-DSA) and FIPS 205 (SLH-DSA):

  • Algorithm diversity — ML-DSA and Falcon both rely on structured lattices; backup families reduce correlated risk.
  • HQC — non-lattice KEM backup advancing toward standardization.
  • On-ramp signatures — candidates with different mathematical foundations (multivariate, hash-based, MPC-in-the-head).

Listen to the full Root Causes 613 episode for selection criteria: security, performance, and implementation characteristics.

The embedded interview with Moody (PQShield) covers complementary migration strategy guidance. See NIST's PQC project page for official updates.

What it does not cover

Contest updates inform strategy; they do not replace inventory. You cannot prioritize Falcon vs ML-DSA deployment until you know which systems consume which certificate chains.

This quarter

  1. Read Root Causes 613 and note on-ramp candidates relevant to your PKI constraints (signature size, verification speed).
  2. Inventory signature algorithms separately from key exchange — authentication migration is harder.
  3. Plan crypto-agility so algorithm swaps do not require forklift infrastructure changes.

Continue on the Q-Day hub: ML-KEM migration guide

References & further reading

Authoritative primary sources cited in this article. Summaries are our own — follow links for full context.

Last verified 2026-06-21

See your exposure with evidence

Run a live PQC inventory scan, export a CBOM, and verify signed reports independently.